Add Question

Question Title

Would you rather...

Blue Option
Red Option
 

 

Back to top

Would you rather...

Have loved and lost

Never loved at all

Would you rather...

0%
11,494 agree
Have loved and lost
0%
3,058 disagree
Never loved at all

A Question of Love

added by Patrick
Loading Comments…
  • Meta Votes14,552 votes
  • Tags

5 comments

  • 0

    Kronos

    2 years ago

    duh ! obvious unless you never loved someone

  • 2

    r3dsparcl3

    1 year ago

    it is better to have loved and lost than to never love at all.

  • 0

    Linkums

    3 weeks ago

    At least then I'd know it was possible

  • 0

    MissHorrorshow

    2 weeks ago

    I hate this statement, because I have loved and lost...a whole lot. When you love someone and they leave you and you have nothing to show for the love and time and care you put into the relationship but tears and self-loathing that is without a doubt the bigger burden than never loving at all. You expend nothing of yourself when you don't love anyone. You stay whole. When you love and lose, each person takes a piece of you with them. That's the lynchpin of this statement. "Loved and LOST", meaning you've never had and never will have a love that will not fail. If it was "Loved or never loved" then obviously "loved" would be the choice. As someone who has never loved someone who didn't walk away, I'd trade it all right this second if I knew I'd never EVER have to feel that pain again.

  • 0

    Crissy

    1 week ago

    Loved and lost.

Tip: Use the arrow keys to navigate between questions.

Recently Answered

  • You haven't answered any questions yet.

You Rather Mobile

You Rather is available for free on iOS and Android. You're welcome.

For iOS For Android